Marvin A. Gorodensky - Toronto Employment LawyersMarvin A. Gorodensky - Toronto Employment LawyersMarvin A. Gorodensky - Toronto Employment LawyersMarvin A. Gorodensky - Toronto Employment Lawyers
  • Home
  • Recently Terminated
  • Our Services
    • Wrongful Dismissal
    • Unjust Dismissal
    • Constructive Dismissal
    • Workplace Discrimination
    • Workplace Harassment
  • Our Lawyers
  • Free Consultation
  • Fees
  • FAQ
    • Issues of Interest
  • Contact Us
☎ Call: (416) 323 9395
✕

Mental Distress – An Overview

  • Home
  • Issues of Interest
  • Uncategorized
  • Mental Distress – An Overview
Bad Faith Damages – A Case Analysis
April 21, 2015
Mental Distress – A Case Analysis
April 21, 2015

Rare will be a termination of employment which does not cause an employee to suffer emotionally and psychologically from the loss of work and associated loss of income, the loss of self-esteem and the disruptions to one’s life which result. The question considered here, is under what, if any circumstances can an employee sue for damages which result from the loss of employment.

“Aggravated” damages are awarded to compensate for aggravated injury. They are meant to take into account intangible injuries and are awarded in addition to damages that are otherwise available for wrongful dismissal. As one Court has observed:
“The aim of aggravated damages is to ‘soothe a plaintiff whose feelings have been wounded by the quality of a defendant’s misbehaviour’. They are a “balm for mental distress’ which is brought about by the wrongful ‘character of the defendant’s wrongdoing’. There must be evidence of damage of this type to the plaintiff.”

The leading case on aggravated damages in the employment context is Vorvis v. Insurance Corp. of B.C. In Vorvis, the plaintiff had returned to school to study law, after a successful career as a sales manager. Upon graduation, he went to work for the defendant and over the course of seven years, received a promotion and several merit pay increases.

Difficulties arose for the plaintiff upon the defendant’s decision to hire a new general counsel who became the plaintiff’s immediate supervisor. The mandate of the general counsel was to improve the productivity of the corporation’s legal department. The general counsel became increasingly dissatisfied with the pace of the plaintiff’s work, and instituted weekly productivity meetings to review the plaintiff’s performance. The trial judge noted that these meetings became “an inquisition” and “as the pressure increased the plaintiff became tense, agitated and distressed, finally requiring medical attention and a tranquilizer.”

A little more than year after the general counsel’s hire, the plaintiff was terminated simply because, according to trial judge, the plaintiff no longer fit into counsel’s plans for the legal department.

The plaintiff brought suit seeking damages for wrongful dismissal and damages for mental distress arising from his termination of employment. The courts at all levels concluded that the mental distress experienced by the plaintiff as a result of his termination, did not give rise to aggravated damages in addition to the damages he sought for wrongful dismissal.

The Supreme Court of Canada noted that where a claim is based upon breach of an employment contract, damages are limited to the financial loss suffered by the innocent party and cannot include damages for injured feelings. In the employment context, such financial damages would result from the employer’s failure to provide reasonable notice.

To found a claim for aggravated damages where an employee has been terminated, there must be evidence of a wrong committed by the employer separate and apart from its failure to provide appropriate notice. According to Vorvis, in the absence of such an “actionable wrong”, the employer’s conduct, even though offensive and hurtful to the plaintiff, would not give rise to aggravated damages.

When have the Courts awarded damages for mental distress in the context of a termination of employment? What will the Plaintiff need to show in order to establish an independent actionable wrong? These questions will be the subject of further articles touching on the issue of mental distress.

This article is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Any individual questions or legal issues should be discussed with independent counsel.

Latest posts

  • COVID-19 Lay Off Bulletin
    March 31, 2020
  • The New World – Employment Contracts
    September 5, 2019
  • Toronto Workplace Harassment Lawyers
    September 5, 2019
  • Toronto Workplace Discrimination Lawyers
    September 5, 2019
  • Toronto Constructive Dismissal Lawyers
    September 5, 2019
  • Toronto Unjust Dismissal Lawyers
    September 5, 2019
  • Toronto Wrongful Dismissal Lawyers
    September 4, 2019
  • Appropriate notice and the employment contract
    March 18, 2019
  • Termination – With Cause, Without Cause or Just Cause
    March 17, 2019
  • Termination issue cause of intoxication – Wrongful Dismissal.
    March 16, 2019
  • A Case of Employee Dishonesty Resulting in Termination
    March 15, 2019
  • EMPLOYMENT STANDARDS ACT PAYMENTS AND COMMON LAW DAMAGES — WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE?
    March 14, 2019
  • TERMINATED FOR CAUSE – WHERE DO I GO?
    March 13, 2019
  • A poor performance cannot be the cause of termination – Toronto Employment Lawyer
    March 12, 2019
  • What is Overtime & How Is It Calculated?
    February 28, 2019
  • Termination of Employment, Notice and Pay in Lieu of Notice
    February 27, 2019
  • WRONGFUL DISMISSAL AND THE EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT
    February 26, 2019
  • RESIGNATION
    February 25, 2019
  • Employment: Why You May Want to Provide termination package
    February 24, 2019
  • Employment Termination Without Reason, Cause or Pay
    February 23, 2019

Home | Our Services | Our Lawyers | Free Consultation | FAQ | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of use | Useful Articles | Resources

© Dismissed.ca (2020) All rights reserved. Designed by 5 DIGITAL

    ☎ Call: (416) 323 9395